用户登录
期刊信息
  • 主管单位:
  • 中国科学技术协会
  • 主办单位:
  • 中国仪器仪表学会、上海光学仪器研究所、中国光学学会工程光学专业委员会
  • 主  编:
  • 庄松林
  • 地  址:
  • 上海市军工路516号上海理工大学《光学仪器》编辑部
  • 邮政编码:
  • 200093
  • 联系电话:
  • 021-55270110
  • 电子邮件:
  • gxyq@usst.edu.cn
  • 国际标准刊号:
  • 1005-5630
  • 国内统一刊号:
  • 31-1504/TH
  • 邮发代号:
  • 单  价:
  • 15.00
  • 定  价:
  • 90.00
光学玻璃磁性复合流体抛光应力与材料去除率的实验研究
Experimental study on the stress and material removal rate of optical glass by MCF polishing
投稿时间:2017-12-14  
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-5630.2018.05.013
中文关键词:  磁性复合流体  抛光  正应力  剪切应力  材料去除率
英文关键词:magnetic composite fluid  polishing  positive pressure  shear stress  material removal rate
基金项目:
作者单位E-mail
郝宇 上海理工大学 机械工程学院, 上海 200093  
姜晨 上海理工大学 机械工程学院, 上海 200093 jc_bati@163.com 
摘要点击次数: 3270
全文下载次数: 2158
中文摘要:
      根据光学玻璃元件超精密加工技术的需求,研究自旋转式和行星旋转式磁性复合流体(MCF)抛光的应力分布和材料去除率。首先,设计可实现自旋转和行星旋转抛光装置,搭建抛光实验平台;然后,进行自旋转式和行星旋转式MCF抛光实验,通过自行设计抛光应力分布测试实验分析了两种抛光方式的应力分布规律;最后,通过定点抛光实验,对抛光前后的工件表面轮廓进行检测,计算并分析两种抛光方式的材料去除率。实验结果表明,立式的两种抛光方式,正应力均明显大于剪切应力,工件外侧受到的剪切应力大于中心受到的剪切应力,行星式抛光的材料去除率明显大于自旋转式抛光的材料去除率。
英文摘要:
      According to the requirement of ultra-precision machining technology of optical glass elements,the stress distribution and material removal rate of rotary and planetary rotary magnetic composite fluid(MCF) polishing are studied.Firstly,polishing device is designed that can realize the self-rotation and planet-rotation,and experimental platform is built;Then,MCF polishing stress test of the self-rotation and planet-rotation experiments is designed.Stress distribution of two kinds of polishing is studied;Finally,through spot-polishing experiments,surface profile of workpiece is detected and the removal rate of two kinds of polishing is analyzed and calculated.The experimental results show that the positive pressure of the two kinds of polishing is greater than that of the shear stress,and the shear stress on the outside of the polishing workpiece is greater than that of the core in the two polishing methods.The material removal rate of the planet-polishing workpiece is significantly greater than the material removal rate of the self-rotating polishing.
HTML   查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭