太赫兹电磁波的频率在0.1~10 THz(0.03~3 mm)范围内,位于电子学与光子学的过渡区[1-2]。表面等离激元(surface plasmon polariton,SPPs)是金属和介质交界面上的自由电荷集体振荡形成的一种表面波,具有局域电场增强和突破衍射极限的特点[3-5]。石墨烯等离激元在纳米光学成像、生物传感、光学调制等方面的应用越来越成熟[6-9],石墨烯具有宽光谱光学吸收、高室温载流子迁移率、电可调载流子密度等优异的特性,在太赫兹光电器件领域展现出巨大的应用潜力[10-12]。本文设计的金属−石墨烯复合天线结构具备优异的电磁耦合特性,可在亚波长尺度实现光的局域与操控。2015年,Xiong等[13]提出一种通过金属等离子体结构和光捕获技术增强石墨烯光吸收的方法,其数值模拟展示了在780~
本文提出了一种金属−石墨烯复合天线结构,将石墨烯条带集成到金属偶极子天线的间隙中,并使用时域有限差分法(finite difference time domain,FDTD)[16]对其太赫兹耦合特性进行了详细的仿真研究。首先,对金属结构(偶极天线)进行系统分析,包括透射光谱、电场分布、结构参数等方面;然后,分析了石墨烯电导率、尺寸和材料参数对其光学吸收特性的影响。发现了两类谐振:偶极共振和石墨烯SPPs共振。为了探究这两个共振峰的相互作用,对偶极天线长度进行扫描。结果显示,随着偶极长度的缩短,偶极共振向高频移动,并与石墨烯SPPs共振发生动态耦合:相遇、交错、分离。其中两峰相遇时,出现弱耦合效应,可将石墨烯的吸收增强至31%。然后对石墨烯进行参数扫描,发现金属−石墨烯复合天线具有调谐性并可有效增加谐振带宽。本项研究为通过金属−石墨烯复合天线结构提高石墨烯在太赫兹频段的吸收性能提供了新的思路,并为开发高效、可调谐的太赫兹天线和探测器提供了有价值的参考。
1 结构与仿真光学天线能够将自由空间中的光频电磁波汇聚于天线表面亚波长尺度的空间内,极大提高了光子的态密度,广泛应用于突破衍射极限以及增强光与物质的相互作用[17]。偶极天线因其全向性、高效率、宽带宽、平衡配置、结构简单和良好的方向性等优势,在无线通信领域中占据了重要地位[18]。本文研究的偶极天线周期阵列结构以及偶极共振原理如图1所示。阵列结构如图1(a)所示,x方向周期为27 μm,y方向占空比为80%。太赫兹平面波垂直入射,电场方向平行于y方向。单个偶极天线参数如图1(b)所示,偶极天线长度L为50 μm,偶极天线宽度G为2 μm,沟道宽度W为3 μm,厚度为0.1 μm。其中,金属结构的复介电常数由Drude模型给出
|
图 1 偶极天线结构及偶极共振 Figure 1 Dipole antenna structure and dipole resonance |
| $ \varepsilon_m=1-\dfrac{\omega_{\mathrm{p}}^2}{\omega^2+\mathrm{i}\gamma_{\mathrm{p}}\omega} $ | (1) |
式中:金的等离子频率
偶极天线共振原理如图1(b)所示。当电场平行于金属臂极时,金属表面会产生感应电流I,并在金属臂两端积累大量的异号电荷。由于两根金属臂相互作用,偶极天线在共振时会在馈电间隙处产生一个强的局域电场。在偶极共振处,馈电间隙两侧的异号电荷积累到最大值,此时电场最强。偶极天线开路共振频率与其长度L的关系[19]为
| $ L=\dfrac{\lambda }{{n}_{\text{eff}}}=\dfrac{c}{{n}_{\text{eff}}f} $ | (2) |
式中:c为真空中的光速;
光与石墨烯的相互作用主要涉及带间和带内两种能带跃迁,石墨烯表面电导率可以直接用Kubo公式[20]计算
| $ \sigma (\omega ,{E}_{f},\tau ,T)=\dfrac{{\mathrm{j}}{e}^{2}(\omega -{\mathrm{j}}{\tau }^{-1})}{\text{π} {\hslash }^{2}} \left[\int \nolimits_{-\infty }^{+\infty }\dfrac{\left| \varepsilon \right| }{(\omega -{\mathrm{j}}{\tau }^{-1}{)}^{2}}\dfrac{\partial {f}_{{\mathrm{d}}}(\varepsilon )}{\partial \varepsilon }\mathrm{d}\varepsilon - \int \nolimits_{0}^{+\infty }\dfrac{\partial {f}_{{\mathrm{d}}}(-\varepsilon )-\partial {f}_{{\mathrm{d}}}(\varepsilon )}{(\omega -{\mathrm{j}}{\tau }^{-1}{)}^{2}-4(\varepsilon /\hslash {)}^{2}}{\mathrm{d}}\varepsilon \right] $ | (3) |
式中:
| $ \begin{split} \sigma \approx \sigma_{\text{intra}} = & \dfrac{-{\mathrm{j}}e^2 k_{\mathrm{B}} T}{\text{π} \hbar^2 (\omega - j\tau^{-1})} \\& \left[ \dfrac{E_f}{k_{\mathrm{B}} T} + 2 \ln \left( \exp \left( -\dfrac{E_f}{k_{\mathrm{B}} T} \right) + 1 \right) \right] \end{split}$ | (4) |
石墨烯归一化表面电导率如图2(a)所示,坐标左轴和右轴分别表示
|
图 2 石墨烯电导率及SPPs共振 Figure 2 Graphene conductivity and SPPs resonance |
| $ \dfrac{{\varepsilon }_{r1}}{\sqrt{{\beta }^{2}\left(\omega \right)-{\varepsilon }_{r1}k_{0}^{2}}}+\dfrac{{\varepsilon }_{r2}}{\sqrt{{\beta }^{2}\left(\omega \right)-{\varepsilon }_{r2}k_{0}^{2}}}=-\dfrac{{\mathrm{j}}\sigma \left(\omega \right)}{{\varepsilon }_{0}} $ | (5) |
式中:
当石墨烯放置在偶极天线的馈电间隙处,可以观察到石墨烯SPPs共振与偶极共振动态耦合的过程,其单元结构如图3(a)所示。设置太赫兹平面电磁波正入射到结构表面,电场方向平行于金属臂,x和y方向使用周期循环边界条件,L=0.8×Ty,Tx=20 μm,石墨烯参数
|
图 3 金属−石墨烯复合天线结构和两种谐振动态耦合过程 Figure 3 Structure of metal-graphene composite antenna and coupling process of two resonant dynamics |
基于上述金属−石墨烯复合天线的结构模型,通过扫描石墨烯参数进行数值模拟,进一步探究偶极共振与石墨烯SPPs之间的相互作用。偶极天线和石墨烯的尺寸参数和周期固定不变,具体如下:L=50 μm,G=2 μm,W=3 μm,Ty=62.5 μm,Tx=20 μm。偶极天线馈电间隙处有无石墨烯条带的反射率谱如图4所示,无石墨烯条带的偶极天线在6.43 THz处的共振峰是由偶极共振引起的(橙色曲线),在馈电间隙加入石墨烯条带后,在5.15 THz和6.59 THz处分裂成了两个单独的共振峰(绿色曲线)。根据耦合模式理论[22],高频的共振峰源于石墨烯SPPs与偶极天线之间的异相耦合,而低频共振峰则由两者的同相耦合所致。
|
图 4 偶极天线馈电间隙处有无石墨烯条带的反射率谱图 Figure 4 Reflectance spectrum with or without graphene strip at the feed gap of a dipole antenna |
金属−石墨烯复合天线最重要的特性是其可调谐性,仿真改变石墨烯费米能级(固定
|
图 5 改变石墨烯费米能级和散射时间的吸收率和反射率谱图 Figure 5 The absorption and reflection spectra of graphene with altered Fermi energy levels and scattering times |
此外,探究了石墨烯散射时间对石墨烯SPPs和偶极共振峰耦合特性的影响如图5(b)所示,当散射时间
本文设计了一种金属−石墨烯复合天线结构,通过FDTD仿真系统地研究了该结构的光学响应。首先,分别分析了偶极天线和石墨烯条带的共振原理与特性,探究偶极共振峰和石墨烯SPPs共振峰的基本特性;然后,将石墨烯条带放置在偶极天线的馈电间隙处,观察到会同时出现两种不同类型共振峰的相互作用−石墨烯SPPs共振峰和偶极共振峰。当石墨烯参数一定时(
| [1] | SIZOV F, ROGALSKI A. THz detectors[J]. Progress in Quantum Electronics, 2010, 34(5): 278–347. |
| [2] | JIN M H, WANG Y X, CHAI M Q, et al. Terahertz detectors based on carbon nanomaterials[J]. Advanced Functional Materials, 2022, 32(11): 2107499. DOI:10.1002/adfm.202107499 |
| [3] | CUI L, WANG J G, SUN M T. Graphene Plasmon for optoelectronics[J]. Reviews in Physics, 2021, 6: 100054. DOI:10.1016/j.revip.2021.100054 |
| [4] | AFTAB M, MANSHA M S, IQBAL T, et al. Surface Plasmon excitation: theory, configurations, and applications[J]. Plasmonics, 2024, 19(4): 1701–1719. DOI:10.1007/s11468-023-02095-2 |
| [5] | LUO X G, YAN L S. Surface Plasmon polaritons and its applications[J]. IEEE Photonics Journal, 2012, 4(2): 590–595. |
| [6] | WU L, CHU H S, KOH W S, et al. Highly sensitive graphene biosensors based on surface Plasmon resonance[J]. Optics Express, 2010, 18(14): 14395–14400. DOI:10.1364/OE.18.014395 |
| [7] | LUAN Y L, KOLMER M, TRINGIDES M C, et al. Nanoscale infrared imaging and spectroscopy of hot-electron plasmons in graphene[J]. Physical Review B, 2023, 107(8): 085414. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.107.085414 |
| [8] | CHEN X, WANG Y, XIANG Y J, et al. A broadband optical modulator based on a graphene hybrid plasmonic waveguide[J]. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 2016, 34(21): 4948–4953. DOI:10.1109/JLT.2016.2612400 |
| [9] | RODRIGO D, LIMAJ O, JANNER D, et al. Mid-infrared plasmonic biosensing with graphene[J]. Science, 2015, 349(6244): 165–168. DOI:10.1126/science.aab2051 |
| [10] | ZHOU Q G, QIU Q X, HUANG Z M. Graphene-based terahertz optoelectronics[J]. Optics & Laser Technology, 2023, 157: 108558. DOI:10.1016/j.optlastec.2022.108558 |
| [11] | BAO Q L, LOH K P. Graphene photonics, plasmonics, and broadband optoelectronic devices[J]. ACS Nano, 2012, 6(5): 3677–3694. DOI:10.1021/nn300989g |
| [12] | LOW T, AVOURIS P. Graphene plasmonics for terahertz to mid-infrared applications[J]. ACS Nano, 2014, 8(2): 1086–1101. DOI:10.1021/nn406627u |
| [13] | XIONG F, ZHANG J F, ZHU Z H, et al. Ultrabroadband, more than one order absorption enhancement in graphene with plasmonic light trapping[J]. Scientific Reports, 2015, 5: 16998. DOI:10.1038/srep16998 |
| [14] | SANG T, GAO J, YIN X, et al. Angle-insensitive broadband absorption enhancement of graphene using a multi-grooved metasurface[J]. Nanoscale Research Letters, 2019, 14(1): 105. DOI:10.1186/s11671-019-2937-7 |
| [15] | WU J J, GAO J X. Multi-band absorption characteristics of a metal-loaded graphene-based photonic crystal[J]. Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures, 2021, 129: 114675. DOI:10.1016/j.physe.2021.114675 |
| [16] | LESINA A C, VACCARI A, BERINI P, et al. On the convergence and accuracy of the FDTD method for nanoplasmonics[J]. Optics Express, 2015, 23(8): 10481–10497. DOI:10.1364/OE.23.010481 |
| [17] | BHARADWAJ P, DEUTSCH B, NOVOTNY L. Optical antennas[J]. Advances in Optics and Photonics, 2009, 1(3): 438–483. DOI:10.1364/AOP.1.000438 |
| [18] | TA S X, PARK I, ZIOLKOWSKI R W. Crossed dipole antennas: a review[J]. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, 2015, 57(5): 107–122. DOI:10.1109/MAP.2015.2470680 |
| [19] | NOVOTNY L. Effective wavelength scaling for optical antennas[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2007, 98(26): 266802. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.266802 |
| [20] | WANG Z J, ZHOU M, LIN X, et al. A circuit method to integrate metamaterial and graphene in absorber design[J]. Optics Communications, 2014, 329: 76–80. DOI:10.1016/j.optcom.2014.05.010 |
| [21] | REN X G, SHA W E I, CHOY W C H. Tuning optical responses of metallic dipole nanoantenna using graphene[J]. Optics Express, 2013, 21(26): 31824–31829. DOI:10.1364/OE.21.031824 |
| [22] | YARIV A. Coupled-mode theory for guided-wave optics[J]. IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, 1973, 9(9): 919–933. DOI:10.1109/JQE.1973.1077767 |
2026, Vol. 48
Issue (2): 68-74


